Judge Rules To Not Open Juvenile Record Of NFL Star
AP
New York Giants running back Ahmad Bradshaw smiles during NFL football practice Saturday, Jan. 26, 2008 in East Rutherford, N.J.
Michael Owens
Advertisement
Text size: small | medium | large
By Michael Owens
Reporter / Bristol Herald Courier
Published: August 2, 2008
The juvenile court history of New York Giants running back Ahmad Bradshaw will remain sealed from public scrutiny, a circuit court judge ruled Friday afternoon.
Also to remain under wraps is the court order that recently landed Bradshaw, 22, of Bluefield, Va., in jail for 28 days on an undisclosed probation violation stemming from his juvenile past.
“I think some things are intended to remain mysteries. This may be one of them,” Giles County Circuit Court Judge Colin Gibb ruled in a teleconference with the Bristol Herald Courier, the Virginia Attorney General’s Office and Bradshaw’s attorney. The initial hearing was held Wednesday in Pearisburg, Va.
Gibb’s ruling defeats the Herald Courier’s assertion that both Bradshaw’s file and the sentencing order fall under Virginia statutes that opens some juvenile felony cases to public scrutiny. The statutes allow public access to felony cases involving minors 14 or older.
Bradshaw left the Southwest Virginia Regional Jail in Abingdon on July 13 after serving the initial portion of a sentence sandwiched around the upcoming NFL season. He will return to jail to finish his sentence when the football season ends next year, according to a corrections officer at the jail.
The newspaper argued that Tazewell County Juvenile and Domestic Relations Judge Henry A. Berringer and Court Clerk Connie Cheryl Roberts erred by sealing the files.
But Gibb, appointed from outside the region to hear the case, noted that Bradshaw’s juvenile history lacked the felony conviction that would keep the file open. This could mean that Bradshaw was charged as a minor with either a felony or misdemeanor crime and received a suspended sentence instead of a guilty verdict and time in juvenile detention. It could also mean that he was younger than 14 years old when charged.
The judicial ruling comes the night after the NFL announced it had cleared Bradshaw’s probation violation as a breach of the league’s personal-conduct policy.
The “conduct occurred prior to his NFL career. However, his prior history would be taken into account if there are any further incidents,” NFL spokesperson Greg Aiello confirmed by e-mail Thursday.
| (276) 645-2549
Page 1 of 1
Post a Comment
(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Report Inappropriate Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Reader Reactions
Posted by ( watchdog ) on August 02, 2008 at 11:16 am
ARE YOU READY FOR SOME FOOTBALL?
(Is the Abingdon Regional Jail Facility CLOSED for the season?)
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( rawbleedorange ) on August 02, 2008 at 10:10 am
good! his juvenile record was of no importance to the BHC. all you all was wanting to do was bring to light his childhood wrong doings,,and for what purpose. to sell a few more papers. looks to me like he has righted his ship,and you guys was wanting to try and steer it off course.
Report Inappropriate Comment