Sending Money Back To Commonwealth Irks Local Governments

Sending Money Back To Commonwealth Irks Local Governments

APGraphic

David McGee

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

By David McGee
Staff Writer / Bristol Herald Courier
Published: July 24, 2008

BRISTOL, Va. – City leaders learned Wednesday they must repay about $266,000 in state funding and they expect additional cuts could be “devastating,” City Manager Bill Dennison said.

The return is part of a 4 percent reduction in state funding approved earlier this year by the General Assembly. City leaders set aside $300,000 in the current budget to meet the state requirement, listing the line item as “local aid to the commonwealth” in protest.

As the state budget continues to hemorrhage beneath the weight of diminished sales and real estate tax collections, more reductions seem certain, Dennison said.

“The General Assembly’s money committees – House Appropriations and Senate Finance – meet in mid-August,” Dennison said. “We don’t know what they’ll do, but we anticipate another round of cuts.”

Current speculation puts the figure at between 4 percent and 7 percent for the reductions, Dennison said.

“Seven percent would be devastating,” Dennison said. “With the 4.4 percent cuts this year on top of the 5 percent last October, it would just pile more onto that.”

As part of the most recent cuts, the General Assembly established a mechanism to further reduce funding to localities without additional legislative action, Dennison said.

Local governments will just have to live with less, said Kenneth Reynolds, chairman of the Washington County Board of Supervisors.

“It looks like there will be more paid back or more reductions to the counties and cities,” Reynolds said. “If that’s the way it’s going to be, we’ll just have to make some adjustments. That’s reality, sometimes.”

Washington County is sending back more than $180,000 to the state as part of the most recent cuts.

In Russell County, officials are writing a check for almost $121,000, County Administrator Jim Gillespie said.

“Yes, it hurts,” Gillespie said. “It’s always better to be on the receiving end of money. I figure there will be a second round of cuts, but I hope it won’t come until the next fiscal year.”

Under the state’s biennial budget, the county is to send back another $121,000 next year.

“I expect they’ll add onto that,” Gillespie said, adding that any cuts hurt when the price of fuel for sheriff’s cruisers and school buses continues to climb.

Bristol Virginia officials expect to receive more than $15.6 million from the state in fiscal 2008-09, while the city school system expects to get $12.8 million in state money.

Dennison and Mayor Jim Rector discussed the dilemma at the conclusion of Tuesday’s City Council meeting, citing the school system and police department as possible targets.

“So far, K-12 education has largely escaped the cuts and there seems to be a bull’s-eye squarely on that program,” Dennison said. “If that happens, the local [school] boards will be coming to local governments with their hands out. And you [the city council] will have to make up those cuts from local sources.”

Rector said the city plans to ask area lawmakers to consider cutting mandates associated with any money that may be reduced.

“It’s not good. I expect another round of cuts, and I expect we’ll [council] meet in October to review our budget and determine what cuts we can make,” the mayor said.

The state also could trim funding for local police departments, Dennison said. Known as 599 funding for the House bill that two decades ago implemented the program to help fund law enforcement, it comprises a significant portion of the city budget.

“There is some fairly widespread sentiment in the House to eliminate 599 funding,” Dennison said. “That would mean $1.2 million to us. That is 20 percent of our local police budget.”

State funding for the city’s police department was reduced by $60,000 as part of the October round of cuts.

| (276) 645-2532

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( Ben Shockley ) on July 24, 2008 at 3:37 pm

There is plenty of areas to cut in this city but they will CONTINUE to take from public safety and the school system. How about starting with the six percent raises the department managers and city leaders received this time around?It makes no sense to purchase a new building for the Parks and Rec. when the city already owns enough space to house this office but they decide to purchase in Washington County? with all the vacant buildings already in the city.You will never hear lets stop paying a Golf Pro more than the Fire or Police Chief in this city. You will never hear lets stop dropping money in this hole in the earth.You will eventually hear we can’t afford to Police this city anymore we are going to have to lay off. The school system will be forced to make a decision in teachers salaries or funding the rest of the school properly. The fact is the debt has got the city in such a shape that it could not buy a cup of coffee because it was not budgeted for. This is a sad day for Bristol Virginia.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( lsc1 ) on July 24, 2008 at 11:32 am

I fail to see why City Leaders are crying about this, considering how they actually allocate the taxpayers’ money.

On July 9, an article in the newspaper indicated that ‘The City Council voted unanimously Tuesday to purchase a home adjacent to Sugar Hollow Park and convert the property to offices for the Parks and Recreation Department’s administrators.

The vote followed a nearly 45-minute discussion about the pros and cons of the project….It also included a $204,500 fund transfer so no money would be borrowed to purchase the 2,800-square-foot home and 4.03 acres.

“I and other council members looked at other alternatives but this was the best place for them to be,” Mayor Jim Rector said after the vote. “And I didn’t want us to borrow money for this.” ‘

I’m not against decent offices for the Parks and Recreation folks, but the City leaders apparently knew about the $300,000 that had to be reimbursed to the state when they all voted to buy yet another piece of real estate at Exit 7.

Now, Dennison and Rector are “discussing the dilemma” as though it is somehow a great surprise (after the Council meeting, no less), and now City lawmakers will be asked to consider cutting mandates…whatever they may be.

The City lawmakers knew what was coming when they signed the agreement to buy that house, and the rest of the citizens will suffer for it through the cutting of mandates.

Looks like the 2008-2009 session is off to yet another typical start.  I just can’t figure out who’s running things yet.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( clyde123 ) on July 24, 2008 at 8:06 am

Sounds a lot like my house budget,too much month left,after the money is gone.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement